1.31.2008

Looks Like My Seats.

So I was reading the updates in PacLand, and read this story about what Manny's doing during his free time during training. Not that interesting, but looking through pictures of him at the Lakers/Cavs game..


and come on! you're telling me that theres no Filipino in LA who could Manny some better seats than this???

Labels: , ,

1.28.2008

Sean Taylor Shirts

So I'm gonna actually offer the Sean Taylor Shirts for Sale. It's gonna be $25 each. I know the price is kinda steep but I'm not making a profit on these. It's just how much I end up paying for them. It makes me think about selling the Manny ones too.


Anyways, here are the pics of the shirt. Marked for security purposes.






and closeups



Labels: , , ,

I Love Goooollllldddd.

Ok, so here's something that i've been thinking about ( i guess since November) and decided to do a little research on.

The Wizards uniforms have gone through ALOT of changes. When the Wizards were first coined in 1997, the new color scheme (since red, white, and blue just wasn't good enough anymore) that Abe Pollin (or whoever) decided to go with was Black, Blue, and Bronze. It was a fresh look to a fresh team, that would share the same colors with the Caps (NHL) and Mystics (WNBA). The orginal blue that was used started out as a faded version of a regular blue (as it is now), then transitioned into more of royal blue (during the Jordan era), but has since backtracked back into what Adidas labels as "Lone Blue" which both the Wiz and T-Wolves share as the only two teams in the league to use that particular shade.

I guess MJ got a little tired of black and red.

So on it went, new faces here, a different shade of blue there, but the Wiz kept the general 'Black, Blue, Bronze' colorway for about 9 years or so (The Caps and Mystics have since dropped the colorway). During the Jordan era, when they switched to royal, it was most likely to be able to match Jordan products (which were typically commercially released in a royal colorway anyways). After all, because J's were (and still are) really popular in the tradition red/black colorway, why not go after the other big color market, royal. For reference, here's Jordan's first shoe while he was a member of the Wiz (black, white, royal colorway):


The royal jerseys weren't visually unpleasing, but they didn't really stand out either (other than that a living legend was wearing one). In fact, the royal made the uni's look kinda corny. I don't know why, but they just had no character. And I know the lone blue isn't THAT much of a departure from the royal, but that little bit actually goes a long way to differentiate them from the land of boring looking jerseys. After Jordan left, the lone blue slowly worked its way back into the mix, finally coming back for good in the 02-03 season.


And so things went for the next couple years. We wore white at home, blue on the road. Then came 2006... and almost out of nowhere, these things showed up.


a little suspect.

In the 06-07 season, this alternate road jersey showed up to everyone's surpise since it was pretty much completely different than what we were accustomed to. As an avid fan, I caught wind that the Wiz were going to be releasing an alternate road/home jersey (after using retro Bullet throwbacks for the past couple years as their alternate jersey). It was exciting. Finally, a new look jersey but the Wizards name on it. Most people (including me) expected a regular road jersey but in black with the blue sides and trim. It fit the color scheme, it was different, and they even went through the trouble of offering a replica jersey with this scheme:

sorry for the horrendous quality, but pictures of this colorway don't hardly exist no more.

But nope, we got the gold ones instead. I remember when I first saw these, I absolutely hated them (along with a WHOLE LOT of other people). Now that its been an entire season of seeing them in action, I'll admit, I've actually grown to like them. I know they're a little weird looking, and pretty much eryone in the league thinks they're ugly, but at least when you see them, you know what team it is. It's like yellow and purple, black and red, and green and white. When you see those colors on tv, you automatically know which team is playing. Anyways, i still like the blue uniform too, and i'm glad they're using both instead of just sticking wit one.

But that brings me to the point of even starting this post. Somewhere along the way, the Wizards brass must have realized during the season that our colors were black, blue, and BRONZE (and not the gold that was on our jerseys). So this year, they changed that. So now we had to incorporate gold into our jerseys. Simple right? Replace whatever was bronze with gold. Doesn't seem too hard.

Oh but it is. It really is. Whoever design the Wiz uniforms really needs to rethink about how good they are at their job. Here's a visual progression of the white home jersey:

L-R: '02-'07 Jerseys, Oct-Nov '07 Jersey, Nov '07 - Current Jersey

From left to right, we start with the classic Wiz home jersey from last year and years past. It was blue with a bronze outline, perfectly using our colors while maintaing a clean look. It worked. Again, it wasn't the most stunning look ever, but it worked.

So the genius Wiz jersey designers decided that since we're changing the bronze to gold on the jersey, we might as well try a new look. Instead of the big fat names on the back, we removed the outline, sized them down, and were left with an all blue nameplate. (as seen in the middle pics above). Then on Nov. 17, after the Minnesota game (when they wore the redesigned blue jerseys) they ended up reverting back to the old style home jersey with the fat outlined letters for whatever reason (most likely to keep in line with the away jerseys), the only change being changing the bronze outline to gold.

Ok I can live with that.

Now the away blue jerseys on the other hand...


The redesign to start off the year had the names smaller, strictly in gold (to match our new colorway) like the white jerseys did with the blue names. Looking back, its really not a bad look, sure it was pretty hard to read the names, but then again, you should know which player is which by their jersey number anywas. So something must have happened in the early part of November that got the Wizards thinking that the names on the jerseys just weren't cutting it. So they changed it too. But instead of white with a gold outline (to keep, ironically in uniform with past jerseys like they did with the home white), they decided to use gold text with a white outline. The result? a clunky looking back of the jersey whose upperhalf looks overbearing compared with the rest of the jersey. It's almost as hard to read their names on the back of their jerseys now because the way the gold text is outlined in white is not exactly the best contrasting combination in the world. So to sum up, it looks off-balance and is difficult to read. Great revision.

There was no explanation for the change, but then again, I don't know many people really noticed it. Why did they change it? Did they really need to? Who's decision was it? Did the non-outlined names look too plain? Were they that hard to read? Did the colors just blend so well together that it was hard to even notice the names on the jersey? Which colorway caused the change, white, blue, or both? Maybe it was a little bit of everything. Needless to say, we went from decent (last year), to clean (beginning of this year), to blah (the rest of this year.) Keep in mind, I'm only talking about the blue jerseys, as the white and the gold have been virtually unchanged.

I've always liked the Wiz uniforms (maybe biased, maybe not) , and I really hope this isn't their way of phasing out the blue in favor of only gold.

If you're one of the few trying to get your hands on the redesigned blue jersey (with the clunky letters) though, and you're not lucky enough to live near the Verizon Center, the only version you can get is a mish-mash of a jersey instead of what they're really wearing. On NBA.com, WashingtonWizards.com, and Eastbay.com, they all have the new version with gold trim, but with the white name and number. Hmm.

At Modell's in the VC, they have the redesigned jersey from the beginning of the year with the smaller names (all blue for home, all gold for away).

Please no one want the new blue jersey.

Labels: , ,

1.22.2008

I Rolls Dolo Pt. II (The T-Mo Era)

So this post has been put off for the last 3+ months, but I was reviewing my blog (after changing the template up again), and decided to actually finish this post.

4.) AT&T Wireless - Ericsson T60
703-623-9854


Wow. It actually took a minute to find a picture of this phone. I don't really remember the reasons why I bought this one. There was nothing really special about it, except that it had a joystick instead of a d-pad (which NO ONE else had at the time) It didn't do nothing special no ringtones, no nothing, one game (brick), but it was still a good phone. The lack of functionality and customization seriously paralyzed this experience tho.


4.5) AT&T Wireless/Suncom - Ericsson T68


I never actually had this phone, but I'm including it anyways cuz i was sizing this phone up for so long. It was the first GSM phone I wanted (after the switch from TDMA), it was a COLOR screen, which was amazing. I was about to switch to Suncom because they were about to offer the phone. It was basically my old phone, but with a color screen. I'm kinda happy I didn't end up getting this one though, it looks a littly fruity now.


5.) T-Mobile - Nokia 3650
757.553-6300

The switch to T-Mo. AT&T's plans were jus so sh*tty that I couldn't stay with them any longer, and VZW was just waay too exp. So I went ahead and tried out the newbie in the group. and got me a 757 number officially making me Norfolk. I was gonna get a flip phone, cuz i really wanted one, but all of them were so wack. I ended up getting this one for pretty cheap, and WOW. Circular keyboard, first phone wit a camera (for me), video, mp3's, and a WORLD of customization. This was probably my favorite phone that I ever had in all truthfulness. It lagged at times, and I bricked one of them by putting like 15 after market applications on it at once, but damn.. this was a great phone. And the circular keypad? I still think I can text just as fast on this that I can on a keyboard.

6.) T-Mobile - Sidekick II
I got it right before Xmas 2004. The Nokia had done alot, but I really wanted this one. It jus looked too tight, it had a full keyboard, a camera, and that's all I really needed to know before diving into this one. I had so many facecovers on this one, I almost forgot what it looked like without one.




7.) T-Mobile - Motorola Unlocked SLVR L9

I really don't know what it was about this phone that made me want it so bad. I had never used one, I didn't like RAZR's, I never even saw it in real life. I read about all the customization features, I wanted to go back to life without a keyboard, and I bit the bullet. I used it for like a month before I realized that this really wasn't a phone I could use day in day out. Oh well, at least its unlocked, so I can use it anywhere.



8.) T-Mobile - Sidekick 3
I just had to go back. I don't even know why I didn't upgrade to it after the SK2 in the first place. I wanted to be different and wound up being so dissatisfied. Even though sidekicks are a pain in the ass to customize, they are just a few steps away from being a really great phone. This one wasn't the lightyear jump that the SK2 was to the original, but there were still sum good upgrades.
Click on the link at the top for the beginning and the conclusion (BB Curve) to this post.
Overall, I like my BB, it defintiely has its advantages. Who knows, maybe one day I'll go back to the SK (SK4, you BETTER be an upgrade), cuz I played around with the LX, which is definitely sleeker, screen is bigger, but pretty much the exact same phone. If they can make the SK4 more like a standard OS, instead of its tried-and-true-yet-old-and-constricting OS, i might come back.. when's that due date again?

Labels: , ,

1.18.2008

Lots of the Love for the Wiz/Zero Love for 0

The real title of this article is: Lots of the Love for the Wiz/Zero Love for 0 and Ayers. (but that just doesn't roll of the tongue as nicely).








Wow. The Wiz have gone 20-17 so far this season, 17-12 since Gil's knee put an indefinite hold on his season.



This is far cry from where I thought we would be, not even factoring in the thought that Gil wouldn't be playing. In that entry, we had just started 0-3, on our way to 0-5, before somehow turning things around.



Yes, the team has gone 17-12 since 0 went down, but let's not forget the 3 game winning streak we were on while he was still playing, before his knee went lame. There's been alot of talk asking "Are the Wiz actually better withOUT Gilbert Arenas" going around. Even Wilbon has offered his take on the situation, saying, but not really saying, yes. The fact that I read every Wilbon article with a little bias, because of how he handled Sean Taylor's passing, probably made me disagree even more, but that's a whole nother story and entry.



The fact of the matter is, the Wizards aren't better this year because of Gil being out, The Wizards are just better. Period. As of right now, the Wiz record stands at 20-17 after 37 games. Last year'd record at 37 games? 21-16. So to say that they're better without Gil (against a much weaker schedule this year mind you) would be ludicrous. Just looking at that number, we had a better record this time last year with Gil. So now that's he out, the logical explanation would be that the rest of the team has gotten a little better (the play of our all-stars, Butler and Jamison, the improved bench play, the mental toughness these guys have exhibited).



Kevin Broom (of RealGM) does a much, much better job at explaining why although the team looks like a different, (better to some) team, there really isn't much truth to the argument.



I won't go further past that, because I think he does a great job proving that while the team has looked good, it isn't because Gil is wearing a suit and tie on the sidelines.



There's also an argument that Caron Butler should the the alpha dog on the team, and that Gil should be traded because this run they're on proves they can do it without him. But it begs me to ask the question.. do exactly what without him? Be a couple games over .500? Make the playoffs in a weaker conference without making any noise in it? OK, I'll admit, the last point is unseen, and if judging by the back to back wins against Boston, is completely untrue. I love the Wiz, but to truly be championship contenders, I'll admit, we are missing something. I'm not exactly sure what that is, but getting rid of Gil won't solve the problem at all, it'll actually hurt it more. Look, Caron is a good player! (not great, but I won't constitute Gil a great player either, he's not on that Kobe/Lebron/Duncan level), and by all means, I believe he's a crucial key in winning a championship in the future, but so is Gil. I'm not against letting Caron be the #1 guy, but letting go/getting rid of Gil, just makes absolutely no sense logically. To put it more simply, getting rid of Gil by trade, or letting him walk in FA, is just plain stupid. It is. and here's why:



- No one's gonna trade for him. It's not even remotely possible. Sure there was earlier talk in the season about trading him for Kobe, but Gil shot those down pretty quickly. In that blog post, he even bluntly stated:



Nothing against getting traded, but that would be a dumb thing on the part of the team who is accepting me because, don’t they know I’m a free agent? What that means is, if you lose somebody who you really want and you come get me back and I leave too … TA-DAH! That means you have nothing.



He's so unpredictable, why is anybody going to give up the talent necessary to get a guy like Arenas for Gil, who's not even guaranteed to stay there? Even Isiah isn't dumb enough to make a move like that. Add that on top of the fact that he's spent most of the season on the bench with a knee injury? It isn't exactly the most reassuring thing in the world.



- Gil has been (and will continue to be) the aforementioned alpha dog on this team, and its because of him, that we're actually on the NBA radar, especially after the mess that was Jordan's "everyone would like to conveniently forget" days with the Wiz. I'd argue to say he and Clinton Portis are Washington's favorite athletes. This town loves him. The Wizards would lose many fans if they let him walk in FA...



- But it doesn't really matter, because Ernie Grunfeld isn't going to let Gil walk in FA, even if that means we sign Gil for max money. Ok, He let Larry Hughes and Jared Jeffries because they weren't worth the money. But would (or did) anyone argue those moves? No, because we got Caron when Larry left, and because no one really cared about Jared Jeffries. If you're telling me that if we let Gil walk, we could get DWade, or Baron Davis, or Tony Parker, aite, then we'd probably be ok. Are we going to get someone like that if Gil leaves? Nope. We can offer him money that other teams can't. That's the luxury of already having the player. Even if we didn't sign him, we wouldn't have the money to lure other potential high quality free agents. Even if we did, there aren't any good ones until next summer anyways. To let a high quality guard like Arenas go for nothing when he's only beginning to enter his prime would have to rank as Bucks-Jabbar type of blunder.



and the biggest point of them all.



- Whether or not you think this Wiz surge this year is because or not because of Arenas being out, I think we can all agree that the team has surprised most of us in terms of how they're playing. Let's not forget though that all the guys on the team are PROFESSIONAL basketball players, and not just some random ballers surrounding Gilbert Arenas. This is a team that made the playoffs last year despite playing its last month without 2 of 3 all stars, with no inside presence (offensively or defensively) to speak of, that ranked second to last defensively. Are you really telling me you guys were expecting Gil to go down and this team to just plummet to last in the standings? I didn't expect them to do this well, but I also didn't expect us to be out of the playoff race.



Yes, we're playing better than I thought. No, I'm not entirely suprised by this.



Can you imagine what this team is capable of when Gil comes back? Read this next portion with some caution, as I'm not saying this is what WILL happen, just what SHOULD happen :). We were a top 3 offensive team last year (should not be a suprise to anybody). Since then, we've fallen to middle of the pack (pls. ref. above article from Kevin Broom). The big difference is DEFENSE. we're actually playing defense this year. According to stats, we're middle of the pack both offensively (10th) and defensively (11th). We're a little above the halfway mark of the league, which pretty much explains why we're a little over .500 and arguably the 3rd best team in the East. We're specifically ranked 11th in the league in defense. 11TH!!! Words cannot express my disbelief and exstaticness (if that's not a real word, it should be) regarding this. If you look at the top 2 teams in the East, undisputably for the most part, Detroit and Boston, they rank in at



1st group.



Detroit - 12th Offensively - 2nd Defensively

Boston - 13th Offensively - 1st Defensively



If we can move up to 3rd again offensively, like we were last year. That puts up pretty much square up with those two elite teams. Granted they're on different ends of the court, but you can't argue that that would make for some interesting if not great basketball come May.



2nd Group. Here are a couple more teams that are around where we're at now:



Dallas - 8th Offensively - 10th Defensively

Portland - 17th Offensively - 8th Defensively

Cleveland - 19th Offensively - 15th Defensively



3rd Group. As opposed to the bottom of the cellar teams defensively this year:



Memphis - 9th Offensively - 29th Defensively

Indiana - 6th Offensively - 28th Defensively



I think most of us were thinking we'd be more likely to be mentioned with the names of the 3rd group when Gil went down rather than the 2nd group let alone the 1st. It shows what defense will do, something Randy Ayers (new defensive specialty coach hired before the start of the season) hasn't been acknowledged for yet (and maybe thats a good thing, as they have to prove it's something we can keep up the whole year).



Overall, I think it's just a good indicator that until Gil comes back, there's no reason to believe that the team is better without him, and that we can be very dangerous upon his return. So hurry back.

Labels: , , ,

Superstitions.

So its definitely been a while since my last blog entry. Call it stupid, call it childish, call it laziness, but part of the reason why I didn't blog at all was because since I had last blogged, the Skins hadn't lost and we were on a playoff run.

Yes it's childish. Yes, its extrememly superstitious. But what crazy sports fans do YOU know that aren't a little superstitious?

Labels: , , ,